Letter to NY State Senator Greg Ball
Jun. 20th, 2011 03:14 pmDear Senator,
Thomas Jefferson once said, "I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Jefferson was saying that laws must not remain immutable; as society changes, so must our laws. It is so important for us as Americans to remember that fact that the above quote is engraved on the wall of the Jefferson memorial in our nation's capital.
Preventing people from gaining the rights and responsibilites of marriage based solely on who they love is barbaric, discriminatory, and disgusting. There is absolutely no reason to prevent two people who are legally capable of entering into a contract from doing so.
I understand that you object to same sex marriage on a religious basis. I believe that it is possible to maintain your religious views without interfering in the lives and happiness of others. If the marriage equality bill passes, your marriage will still be valid. Refusing to pass marriage equality based solely on religious objection would be like a primarily Catholic area outlawing the consumption of meat on Fridays during Lent. It would not be fair to those in the area who do not practice the Catholic religion. Not outlawing meat on Fridays would not prevent practicing Catholics from abstaining from consuming meat should they choose to do so, and it would not hinder anyone else's dietary choices.
Passing the Marriage Equality bill would not harm a single soul, and would bring happiness to and improve the quality of life of thousands of New Yorkers. I am in a heterosexual relationship, and I do not believe that the status of my relationship would be affected in any way by the passage of this bill.
Quite frankly, regardless of whether Tom and George next door are roommates, friends, life partners, married, or living in sin, it's really none of my business. I believe that people who are vocally opposed to marriage equality are far too concerned with the private lives of strangers. If they are opposed to same sex marriage, for whatever reason, that's fine. They don't have to marry someone of the same sex. However, who someone else loves and wants to marry is absolutely none of their business.
I urge you to vote yes on the Marriage Equality bill, because it's time for the laws of New York State to evolve along with society. It's time for us to put on our grown-up coats, and allow all New Yorkers equal marriage rights, regardless of who they love.
Thank you,
(My Name)
(My Address)
Thomas Jefferson once said, "I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Jefferson was saying that laws must not remain immutable; as society changes, so must our laws. It is so important for us as Americans to remember that fact that the above quote is engraved on the wall of the Jefferson memorial in our nation's capital.
Preventing people from gaining the rights and responsibilites of marriage based solely on who they love is barbaric, discriminatory, and disgusting. There is absolutely no reason to prevent two people who are legally capable of entering into a contract from doing so.
I understand that you object to same sex marriage on a religious basis. I believe that it is possible to maintain your religious views without interfering in the lives and happiness of others. If the marriage equality bill passes, your marriage will still be valid. Refusing to pass marriage equality based solely on religious objection would be like a primarily Catholic area outlawing the consumption of meat on Fridays during Lent. It would not be fair to those in the area who do not practice the Catholic religion. Not outlawing meat on Fridays would not prevent practicing Catholics from abstaining from consuming meat should they choose to do so, and it would not hinder anyone else's dietary choices.
Passing the Marriage Equality bill would not harm a single soul, and would bring happiness to and improve the quality of life of thousands of New Yorkers. I am in a heterosexual relationship, and I do not believe that the status of my relationship would be affected in any way by the passage of this bill.
Quite frankly, regardless of whether Tom and George next door are roommates, friends, life partners, married, or living in sin, it's really none of my business. I believe that people who are vocally opposed to marriage equality are far too concerned with the private lives of strangers. If they are opposed to same sex marriage, for whatever reason, that's fine. They don't have to marry someone of the same sex. However, who someone else loves and wants to marry is absolutely none of their business.
I urge you to vote yes on the Marriage Equality bill, because it's time for the laws of New York State to evolve along with society. It's time for us to put on our grown-up coats, and allow all New Yorkers equal marriage rights, regardless of who they love.
Thank you,
(My Name)
(My Address)