fairyrune: (Default)
fairyrune ([personal profile] fairyrune) wrote2008-11-05 09:31 am
Entry tags:

You know what I hope?

I hope that the results of this election lead to some sort of reform within the Republican party.

(Keep in mind that I'm a registered Independant with mostly Libertarian leanings.)



My feeling is that the term "Republican" has become a dirty word not because of what the actual party stands for, but because of what they have come to be associated with.

By now, everyone's seen the footage of the people at McCain rallies spewing hatred based on the supposed race or religion of the opposing candidate instead of on his political ability. McCain himself had to correct one woman who got ahold of the microphone and started going on about how Obama was an Arab.

Then there's the religious right and so-called "neo cons," who have latched themselves on to the Republican party and refuse to let go. These are the people who would govern the entire country based on their specific religious beliefs, with no regard to seperation of church and state or religious freedom.

I'm sure none of the Republicans on my f-list want this country's ideals based on the beliefs of a small percentage of the population, but from where I'm sitting that's the sort of thing the Republican party has come to be known for.

It would seem that Sarah Palin was chosen in part to appeal to those people who would have this country run based on religion. According to exit poll data, she's part of the reason McCain lost.

I guess what I'm saying is that I hope that this loss gives the Republican party the opportunity to take a good look at itself, evaluate what it really stands for, brush itself off, stand up, and do some good for themselves.


Oh, and by the way? The people who keep pointing out that Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein as if it's some sort of disqualifer can shut right the fuck up. Mr. Obama was born in 1961. Saddam Hussein wasn't even elected president of Iraq until 1979, when Barack was already eighteen years old. Saying shit like that makes you sound like a close minded idiot.

[identity profile] drkestetrnlangl.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
and thats one of the many many reasons why I did not support McCain. He got what he deserved!

[identity profile] drkestetrnlangl.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
that was very true. I was very impressed about his speech but i noticed his crowd wasn't. Lets hope that what he said in his speech he will follow it.

[identity profile] drkestetrnlangl.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I hear that! :-D

[identity profile] harpiegirl4.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Just to play devil's advocate, I'd like to point out that it wasn't until today that the press started using his middle name! Not ONCE through the entire campaign did the NY Times use the forbidden "H" word. Now that he's won, they probably got clearance to use it and it's plastered on the front page! Verrrry interesting times we're living in...

[identity profile] picoland.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Ann Coulter used it all the time. She called him B. Hussein Obama...
Guess she also forgot King Hussein of Jordan- a Pro American leader.
Twit-transgen wannabe. Haven't heard frpm her lately, though I suspect she'll get her knickers in a twist soon enough.


[identity profile] paleshadow.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, there's no doubt that some reform is coming to the GOP, but I have to wonder what's going to come out of that reform. If the people who will say that they only lost because they weren't crazy enough (like Limbaugh, say - and don't discount him, because he certainly has an audience) shout loud enough and long enough, they'll keep the reins and run the ship straight into the next iceberg. (Do you read Andrew Sullivan (http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/), by any chance? A lot of his recent writing touches on the prospects for reform in the Republican party.)

Every country needs a principled opposition, whether or not one agrees with the people in power.

EDIT: Incidentally, sorry to nitpick, but the point of the "Barack [b]Hussein[/b] Obama" wasn't to associate him with Saddam, as much to associate him with Muslims (for whom Hussein is actually a common name), which is an entirely different brand of closed-minded idiocy. :) I find it ironic that the two actual Muslims currently in Congress have the thoroughly white-bread names of Keith Ellison and Andre Carson - these rednecks all about traditional common sense never listened to their parents telling them not to judge books by covers.
Edited 2008-11-05 15:47 (UTC)

[identity profile] picoland.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
exactly. effing morons need to jump in a vat of hot wax.


[identity profile] thunderemerald.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
YES to all of this.

[identity profile] degnernj.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
There was a time in history that Hitler was a fine, upstanding name. That was what I would say to any hick that tried to use Obama's middle name as a point in their argument against him. That statement usually ended the argument.

[identity profile] degnernj.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly.

[identity profile] grigoricennui.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
The republican party has ventured far from its former ideals. While they are supposed to stand for smaller government and state rights, they pork it up nearly as much as the Democrats and push to federally legislate morality now a-days.

While overall they probably would benefit from divorcing themselves from the radical Christian movement, it's hard to lose that many votes and dollars all in one shot. Besides, it would precipitate out a 'Christian Shithead' party ala the Talaban which would immediately be the largest third party in America.

J.

[identity profile] woodchuck665.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Hussein is a middle eastern name, but it's the local equal of Smith.

[identity profile] woodchuck665.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
That's actually why the media & those in power usually called him "Saddam." To distinguish him from King Hussein of Jordan (and maybe as a general sign of disrespect, but since Saddam means "the destroyer" in Persian, I don't know if it worked out quite the way we were thinking).

[identity profile] woodchuck665.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Stupid shit Woodchuck knows.